More news & features
- Reflections and thank-you from Pilgrims Group
- Pilgrims Group Wins Contract to Operate Security Facility for British High Commission in Nigeria
- Pilgrims Afghanistan project wins SEA award for International Achievement
- Pilgrims Academy throws open its doors in series of new Open Days
- Pilgrims Academy provides essential cover for Rescue Training
- Pilgrims Group gives Emergency Services a Training Day to Remember
- Fieri and Pilgrims Academy Partnership to Build Future Leaders
- Pilgrims Group Strengthens Salalah Methanol’s Procedures with Best Practice Crisis Management Plan
- Pilgrims Group Training Academy Expands Safety Training Provision
- Australian High Commission and the British Council enlist Pilgrims in Nigeria
- Pilgrims rolls out medical training for any eventuality
- Pilgrims Group earns the global best-practice award, PSC.1
- Feeling safe in an unsafe world
- » View full article list
Published: July 16, 2015
Increasingly affordable technology such as UAVs or drones presents a range of new threats to corporate and personal security. Stuart Fraser, Pilgrims Intelligence Analyst, looks at the challenges they represent.
April 2015: An unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) landed on the roof of the personal residence of the Prime Minister of Japan, Shinzo Abe. It was later determined that the UAV’s payload, a plastic container, contained trace elements of the radioactive element caesium, although not enough to cause physical harm. This incident has followed various high-profile uses of UAVs:
January 2015: A UAV quadcopter (pictured) was flown into the grounds of the US White House by an inebriated member of a US government intelligence agency. Reportedly, the official lost control. He had been controlling it from a few city blocks distance.
The UAV, a DJI Phantom, was spotted by a White House staffer although it could not be prevented from entering the secure perimeter.
Small UAVs (SUAVs) of the type utilised in the above incidents represent a new, and difficult to fully counter, threat for a variety of organisations and facilities. This is a result of both the new technologies involved and the absence of a comprehensive regulatory response.
While small, remotely-controlled platforms (left) have been in existence since 1937, with widespread commercial availability from the 1970s; the technologies involved have only recently begun to represent a conceivable threat. This is primarily the result of advances in miniaturisation of electronics, widespread accessibility of GPS navigation and improvements
The military usage of UAVs in the last decade (most notably for combat and reconnaissance missions, see below right) also undoubtedly stimulated the public perception of such systems and assisted with the development of relevant technologies. This process has led to the development of small, difficult to detect (either visually or through the use of monitoring / surveillance technologies) aerial platforms which have the capability to penetrate (via overflight) fixed ground-based perimeters.
While a fence / wall has historically offered a physical barrier to pedestrians or vehicles, it represents no obstacle for an SUAV. Consequently, the threat is that anyone with access to such a system can now (remotely) access secured facilities…
This feature goes on to cover:
• Assessment of the threat posed by UAVs
• Advances in UAV capabilities and payloads.
• Response to potentially hostile UAVs
• The legal framework
• Physical countermeasures
• Future evolution of UAVs
CLICK THE PDF BELOW TO READ THE ARTICLE IN FULL
UAV Threat Report 070715.pdf